
I am intrigued by Pepsi’s bold decision to take their brand off the largest marketing stage of the year and redirect their $20 million Super Bowl advertising budget to a new national cause campaign. Pepsi has always gone big for the Super Bowl — big on creativity and on celebrity. ABC News reports that Pepsi has spent $142 million in Super Bowl ads in the last decade.
It’s rare for a brand as valuable as Pepsi’s to be this bravely experimental, so clearly there is a lot riding on the Pepsi Refresh Project.
If you didn’t catch the announcement, Pepsi is calling on consumers, businesses and nonprofits to submit good ideas and good causes to be funded through the Pepsi Refresh Project. They will accept up to 1,000 good ideas every month and consumers will then vote for their favorite ideas beginning February 1. Pepsi has partnered with some major players in the cause space, GOOD, DoSomething.org, CityYear and Global Giving.
The campaign holds great promise and, if successful, it could usher in a larger movement away from traditional passive, one-off, event-based advertising and toward these kinds of interactive cause campaigns with local focus, global reach and year-long scope.
Saying all that, I am surprised that Pepsi’s foray into social media and cause marketing had some serious missteps from day one. They launched their Web site before it was ready for game time, which led to database errors when users attempted to submit their “ideas that will have a positive impact.” Their Facebook page was immediately populated not with supportive comments, but with frustrated user complaints. Worse still, some users actually had their confidential information — and intellectual property — compromised by the database errors.
Is Pepsi trying to crowdsource or incite a flash mob?
This all raises the issue of trust. Beyond the undeniable buzz it generates, cause marketing through social media is fundamentally about building a relationship of trust between a brand and its audiences.
While a campaign may certainly have noble intentions and make a social impact, it comes up short if it doesn’t establish a lasting bond of trust during the phases of its execution.
We will see how Pepsi’s early miscues color the credibility of their campaign. The submission process was flawed, but let’s hope the voting process runs as advertised.
While the Pepsi Refresh Project has definitely created brand buzz in these early stages, only time will tell if it will inspire true brand trust.
-Matthew diGirolamo, Cause Catalysts